National Energy Board may consider upstream, downstream emissions from Energy East project

National Energy Board may consider upstream, downstream emissions from Energy East project

GEOFFREY MORGAN, FINANCIAL POST  05.10.2017

 energy east panel

CALGARY — The National Energy Board may consider the upstream and downstream emissions associated with the construction of TransCanada Corp.’s massive Energy East pipeline project.

The NEB released a draft list of issues Wednesday that its hearing panel might consider as it reviews TransCanada’s application to build Energy East, a $15-billion project that would move 1.1 million barrels of oil per day between Alberta and New Brunswick. It also released a draft list for consideration on a TransCanada natural gas pipeline project called the Eastern Mainline.

The draft list includes an item, for which the NEB is requesting feedback, that would require the hearing panel to consider the upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions of the Energy East project and also TransCanada’s eastern mainline project.

“That would really be a first for the NEB,” spokesperson Marc Drolet said. He said the regulator is looking for feedback on that issue and others as it is working “to define the scope of the review” for Energy East.

Emissions impacts have been a controversial issue for the NEB, which did not previously evaluate emissions from pipeline projects in determining whether the projects are in the public interest.

However, intense pressure from environmentalists and criticism during the last federal election has led the federal Liberal party to create a panel to review and modernize the NEB and the regulator may soon consider emissions.

The NEB also restarted its review process for Energy East last year after three panellists reviewing the project stepped down amid allegations two of them had met with a TransCanada lobbyist, former Quebec premier Jean Charest, before hearings on the project began.

The new draft list of issues the regulator may consider for the Energy East project includes economic considerations, aboriginal impacts, safety issues and landowner considerations — all of which were commonplace in past NEB reviews.

However, Drolet said there were a number of other new issues the NEB would also consider, including the potential environmental and economic effects of power line construction and marine shipping as a result of the pipeline project.

The list of new potential considerations also includes the potential impact of government emissions strategies — like carbon taxes — on oil supply and markets “underpinning the need for the project and its economic and financial considerations.”

TransCanada spokesperson Tim Duboyce said, “We view the NEB process as a way for Canadians to weigh in.”

Asked whether he was concerned about the new issues the NEB review panel might consider, Duboyce said, “There’s a lot of material there and we’re going to take the time necessary to go through it.”

Financial Post

 

About prosperitysaskatchewan

Consultant on Saskatchewan's natural resources.

Posted on May 11, 2017, in economic impact, oil, political. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: