Pipeline focus turns toward Energy East

  • 2 Dec 2016
  • Calgary Herald
  • GEOFFREY MORGAN Financial Post

Pipeline focus turns toward Energy East

The National Energy Board is shifting its attention eastward, following the federal government’s approval of the Trans Mountain project to Canada’s West Coast, with new panelists to review the Energy East project to New Brunswick to be appointed “very soon,” according to Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr.

“The Energy East process will be restarted and we will announce new temporary members of the National Energy Board in a matter of weeks not months,” Carr said in an interview in Calgary. “Then the board will have to decide whether it wants to go back to the beginning of the hearings or brief the new commissioners on where the process stopped.”

All three panel members reviewing the TransCanada Corp.’s Energy East venture resigned in September to “preserve the integrity” of the regulator after environmental groups accused the panel of bias in favour of the project.

Carr also said the government recognized the need for Canadian companies to export products to a “diversity of markets,” rather than just the United States, and those diverse markets include both Asia and — importantly for Energy East — Europe.

Financial analysts in Calgary said Carr’s and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s comments about diversifying export markets for commodities is a signal that Ottawa is open to other export pipelines following this week’s approval of Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.

But Brian Lee Crowley, Macdonald Laurier Institute managing director, said any signals Ottawa is trying to send on future pipeline projects are impossible to decipher given that approvals, in Trans Mountain’s case, and denials, in Northern Gateway’s case, seem like political rather than regulatory decisions.

“This throws the entire process into great confusion,” Crowley said, adding the process should be de-politicized.

Referring to this week’s decision to reject Enbridge Inc.’s Northern Gateway pipeline, he added, “I think (it) creates a huge disincentive for people to want to risk their money on pipelines in Canada because we’ve gone from a predictable, rules-based system to one where the outcome depends on whether the prime minister of Canada thinks your pipeline runs through a forest that he likes.”

One industry veteran, who asked not to be named, said the approvals of Trans Mountain and Enbridge’s Line 3 could signal a willingness to approve expansions or retrofits of existing pipelines, but not necessarily new pipelines.

Given that Energy East is a brownfield project through Western Canada and a greenfield project when the line reaches New Brunswick, from where the crude from Western Canada will be exported, it is difcult to predict how the government will treat the plan.

Economists say Energy East is still needed, despite the approvals this week.

“We just went through a long period where it didn’t look like Canada could get pipelines built, because the politics were just too difcult,” said Craig Alexander, Conference Board of Canada senior vice-president and chief economist.

In the past month, however, the surprising election victory of Donald Trump in the U.S. and his willingness to approve TransCanada’s Keystone XL to the U.S. Gulf Coast, plus the Canadian approvals, would result in 1.8 million barrels of incremental oil export capacity from Canada in the near term.

The $15-billion Energy East project would add another 1.1 million bpd of pipeline capacity, raising potential new capacity to just under three million bpd.

“In the long run, Canada will ultimately need expanded capacity into the U.S., but also be able to tap overseas markets both through the West Coast and hopefully through the East Coast,” Alexander said.

TransCanada says it’s looking forward to resuming the Energy East regulatory process and believes the project is still needed.

“Energy East remains of critical strategic importance because it will end the need for refineries in Quebec and New Brunswick to import hundreds of thousands of barrels of foreign oil every day, while improving overseas market access for Canadian oil,” TransCanada spokesperson Tim Duboyce said in an email. “TransCanada and oil shippers remain committed to the project.”

 

 

 

About prosperitysaskatchewan

Consultant on Saskatchewan's natural resources.

Posted on December 2, 2016, in economic impact, oil, political. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: