Why do business in Saskatchewan?

Well, at least the company you bought will still be yours in a few years and not made into somebody else’s without your agreement.



  • 25 Jun 2016
  • National Post – (Latest Edition)
  • Andrew E. Kramer The New York Times

Russia’s energy fire sale begins


For sale in Russia this summer: one repossessed asset, well loved and maintained. Seller is motivated. Everything must go.

In this fire sale, the asset is Bashneft, the oil firm once owned by Vladimir P. Yevtushenkov, who was prosecuted and put under house arrest. And the seller is the Russian state, in desperate need of cash.

At the right price, investors will bite. But the sale, and dozens of others around the country, will reinforce Russia’s reputation in the global markets for uncertainty.

Early in his tenure, President Vladimir Putin pursued a policy of controlling the so- called commanding heights of the economy with a nationalization push that elbowed Russian and foreign owners out of strategic industries. Now, he is inviting investors back, as Russia faces the economic fallout from a second year of Western sanctions and low commodity prices.

The political about- face, part of the seemingly endless cycle in Russia between nationalization and privatization, adds to investors’ worries about being blindsided.

In the early post- Soviet period, privatization was viewed as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. But those opportunities are just happening over and over again under Putin.

Bashneft is coming full circle. Russia’s sixth- largest oil company was first privatized in the early 2000s. Then it was renationalized in 2014 when Yevtushenkov was put under house arrest. Now, it is for sale again.

“Any buyer today should understand the risks,” Aleksandr Y. Abramov, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, said of the latest planned resale of 51 per cent of Bashneft. “In a few years, this deal, too, could be unwound for one reason or another.”

Such uncertainty is a big reason i nvestors remain wary of Russian stocks.

Illustrative of Russia’s stock troubles is Gazprom, the state-controlled oil giant that was once the country’s biggest company. Gazprom’s market value was US$ 52 billion on Tuesday, down from its peak in May 2008 of US$367 billion.

Russia’s mighty oil, mining and industrial holdings looked like a good deal in the early 1990s during the transition from communism to capitalism. The government tried to create a society of stockholders out of the Soviet ashes by giving everyone vouchers representing shares in state- owned businesses. But the chaotically run effort largely flopped.

Hard up for money ahead of an election in 1996, President Boris Yeltsin tried a new tack of catering to rich insiders. He sold companies on the cheap to a new class of wealthy Russians.

After Putin assumed power on New Year’s Eve in 1999, he vowed to eliminate these oligarchs “as a class.” Three years later, police arrested Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, then Russia’s richest man as owner of the Yukos oil company, bought in the sale under Yeltsin.

Foreign investors have been hurt, too.

In 2006, Russian regulators forced Shell to sell a 25- per- cent share in its Sakhalin Island field after threatening to shut it down. The threat went away after Gazprom, the state gas giant, gained control of the field. It was Shell’s second run- in with the Russian agenda. The company’s oil assets in the country were nationalized in 1918, and Shell was only partly compensated by the Soviet government

Bashneft’s story is perhaps one of the most tangled.

In 1993, the Russian government transferred Bashneft to the regional government of Bashkortostan, at a time when Yeltsin was trying to curry favour with local leaders. In the early 2000s, the regional government sold shares to a company owned by local elites, UralInvest. In the years after, Yevtushenkov steadily picked up shares through a holding company called Sistema, in deals that were certain to have been approved by the Kremlin, according to oil analysts.

Then t he government changed its mind. In 2014, prosecutors asserted that the firm’s original transfer — 21 years before — to a regional government had been illegal. So all subsequent transactions were voided.

Yevtushenkov was ensnared by the flurry of crimi nal and civil cases that followed. His shares were handed over to the state.

Yevtushenkov was finally cleared in a ruling late last year. Sistema won US$ 950 million in a lawsuit against the previous owner, UralInvest. A spokesman for Sistema declined to comment.

Russia’s view of Bashneft has changed, too. Putin in April removed Bashneft from a list of so- called strategically important companies, despite substantial proved oil reserves of 2.2 billion barrels. The move clears the way for the company’s potential sale to overseas investors.

The f or- sale signs are broadly up again. Along with Bashneft, the government plans to offer shares in Sovcomflot, a shipping company; Alrosa, a diamond miner; VTB, a state bank; and the national energy giant, Rosneft.

Investors are already sniffing around. Russian oil companies, one run by a former chief executive of Rosneft, have announced plans to bid for Bashneft. Executives and government officials in India and China have said the countries’ energy giants are potentially interested in buying shares in Rosneft.

The government needs money to cover a portion of Russia’s projected deficit this year of 2.4 trillion rubles ($ 36 billion), up from 1.95 trillion rubles ($ 31 billion) last year. And the privatization push is one of the few ways for the government to raise money.

Western sanctions over the Ukraine crisis make it difficult for Russia to hold bond sales. At a meeting of presidential economic advisers last month, Aleksei L. Kudrin, a former minister of economy, suggested the Kremlin spur growth by easing international tensions, as another option along with privatization. Putin responded that Russia would not “bargain with its sovereignty.”




About prosperitysaskatchewan

Consultant on Saskatchewan's natural resources.

Posted on June 27, 2016, in oil, political. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: