Quick regulatory change scares investors away

Corporations want to stand on concrete, not sand.  They want to know what the rules are and have confidence that they will not change – at least not change without plenty of time to plan and adapt.  The below change will scare investors and drive some of them away – away to places like Saskatchewan.  This process can also work in the reverse – away from Saskatchewan.

As Tom MacNeill often stated, capital goes were it’s treated well.



  • 23 Jun 2016
  • Leader-Post
  • Bloomberg

Producers fear ‘chill’ of regulatory change

Alberta regulator requires tougher test for oil, natural gas asset buyers

A sudden regulatory shift threatens to curb Canadian energy asset deals, just as producers and creditors look to unload properties two years into a crude market downturn.

The Alberta Energy Regulator made a surprise rule change Monday evening, requiring a more stringent solvency test for buyers of oil and natural gas assets. While the move is meant to ensure purchasers can cover well cleanup costs, some dealmakers say it will also hinder transactions.

“It’s going to create dampened activity on asset dispositions,” said Sonny Mottahed, managing partner and chief executive officer of Calgary-based Black Spruce Merchant Capital Corp. “People are caught off guard and they’re very surprised.”

The rule change — meant to be an interim measure — is in response to an Alberta court decision last month. That ruling, which the regulator is appealing, let the receiver of bankrupt oil company Redwater Energy Corp. walk away from some assets it deemed unprofitable, plus the related cleanup responsibilities. The case triggered a broader discussion over how environmental liabilities should rank among debts of an insolvent producer, as more default on their loans with U.S. crude still about 50 per cent below its mid-2014 peak.

“We recognize that it’s going to inconvenience some stakeholders but they’re interim measures and we want to ensure the continued protection of Albertans and also confidence in the regulatory system,” Ryan Bartlett, a spokesman for the Alberta Energy Regulator, said in a phone interview.

“We are working with the government of Alberta on a way to come up with a long-term regulatory solution to these issues.”

The main change from the regulator is the doubling of the liability management ratio for asset buyers.

The rating is a reflection of the extent to which a company’s assets cover its liabilities related to well cleanup.

Purchasers are now required to have ratings of two or higher, up from a minimum of one previously. About 72 per cent of 788 licensees evaluated have ratios below the two threshold, according to the regulator’s online list.

Among those with a mandate to buy assets with ratios below two are Pine Cliff Energy Ltd., Northern Blizzard Resources Inc. and Spartan Energy Corp., Ryan Mooney, a director and energy specialist on Dundee Capital Markets’ sales team in Calgary, wrote Tuesday in a note.

Phil Hodge, chief executive officer of Calgary-based Pine Cliff, agreed in a phone interview that the company, which has been acquiring assets for more than four years, may be impeded under the new rule. More concerning though is the potential broader impact on the industry, Hodge said.

With low oil prices, the company is more focused on improving its balance sheet than making purchases, he said.

Buyers can improve their rating by taking a number of steps, including posting a security, addressing existing abandonment obligations or selling assets, according to the regulator’s bulletin.

The move was a “chilling announcement on the first day of summer,” Carolyn Wright, a partner at law firm Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP in Calgary, wrote in a note on Tuesday, calling the development sudden and dramatic.

“It is expected to have a chilling effect on the rise in transaction activity in a province struggling to get back on its feet following a twoyear long rut in commodity prices.”

The Alberta regulator’s change, which doesn’t affect corporate takeovers, is meant to prevent asset deals in which the buyer risks adding to the so called orphan-well backlog.

When bankrupt producers are unable to cover the costs of repairing lands where they pumped oil and gas, the Orphan Well Association, an industry group, becomes responsible for dealing with them at the expense of other companies.

About prosperitysaskatchewan

Consultant on Saskatchewan's natural resources.

Posted on June 23, 2016, in economic impact, oil, political. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: